The Left has no sense of decency sometimes. And this goes way too far.
Because a Congresswoman exposed herself with a disgusting act caught on camera.
Insensitive Outburst Sparks Outrage
During a heated House Judiciary Committee markup session in September 2025, Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) sparked widespread condemnation by referring to Kayla Hamilton—a 20-year-old autistic woman raped and murdered in 2022 by an MS-13 gang member—as a “random dead person.”
The committee was debating the Kayla Hamilton Act, introduced by Rep. Russell Fry (R-SC), which mandates rigorous background checks for Unaccompanied Alien Children (UACs) before their release into U.S. communities. Crockett accused Republicans of exploiting tragedies for political gain, stating, “Stop just throwing a random dead person’s name on something for your own political expediency.” She further criticized the GOP for ignoring victims like those tied to Jeffrey Epstein, alleging selective outrage.
🚨 DISGUSTING BEHAVIOR: Rep. Jasmine Crockett just called Kayla Hamilton, a young girl murdered by an illegal alien, a “random dead person.” pic.twitter.com/pSqBF0RAc5
— House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@JudiciaryGOP) September 10, 2025
Legislative Push for Accountability
The Kayla Hamilton Act, named after Hamilton, who was brutally killed by Walter Javier Martinez, a 17-year-old illegal immigrant with known MS-13 ties, aims to prevent such tragedies through stricter vetting.
Martinez, released without proper checks by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), had a criminal history in El Salvador and visible gang tattoos, details overlooked before his placement in Maryland. “The Kayla Hamilton Act is necessary to ensure background checks of unaccompanied alien children occur before they are released,” said Tammy Nobles, Hamilton’s mother.
“If that had happened in the case of Kayla’s murderer, authorities would have known he was an MS-13 gang member.”
The bill requires background checks via home countries for UACs aged 12+, gang tattoo screenings, secure housing for gang-affiliated minors, bans on illegal immigrants as sponsors, and full data-sharing with DHS. Martinez, sentenced to 70 years after confessing to additional crimes, exemplifies the systemic failures the act targets.
Backlash and Call for Apology
Crockett’s remarks drew sharp rebukes, with Fry calling them “disgusting rhetoric” and “shameful behavior.” “Let me be clear: Kayla Hamilton was not just a random person,” Fry told Fox Digital. “She was a young woman with a family and a future.”
He demanded a public apology to Nobles and victims of “her party’s reckless, open-borders agenda.”
Social media, particularly X, erupted, with users labeling Crockett’s words “sickening” and “vile,” amplifying Nobles’ advocacy for reform. The controversy has bolstered support for the bill, which passed committee, highlighting the urgency of addressing vetting lapses that endanger American communities.
Why Crockett’s Stance Is Wrong
Rep. Jasmine Crockett’s dismissal of Kayla Hamilton as a “random dead person” and her framing of the Kayla Hamilton Act as political exploitation are profoundly misguided, rooted in ethical insensitivity, factual denial, and policy obstruction.
First, her dehumanizing language trivializes a preventable tragedy—Hamilton, a vibrant autistic woman, was targeted due to systemic vetting failures that released a known MS-13 member into her community.
By reducing her to a “random” figure, Crockett dismisses the pain of Nobles, who is suing HHS and DHS for $100 million over negligence, and undermines the bill’s evidence-based reforms, which address specific oversights like ignored tattoos and criminal records. Second, her Epstein comparison is a false equivalence, deflecting from the UAC program’s documented lapses—over 400,000 minors entered since 2021 with minimal screening, correlating with gang-crime spikes.
Finally, Crockett’s attack obstructs bipartisan solutions, ignoring public support (70%+ in polls) for stronger vetting and alienating families seeking justice. Her stance not only misrepresents the act’s intent but exacerbates division, prioritizing ideology over lives and safety.
