The truth about the Democrats is being revealed. Their treason goes deeper than anyone thought.
Because a lawyer’s blown the cover on an Obama-CIA operation to take Trump out of the picture.
Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett claimed on Monday that the Obama administration was aware of Hillary Clinton’s campaign efforts to tarnish President Donald Trump’s reputation by falsely linking him to Russian collusion, yet chose to remain quiet.
On Friday, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard disclosed documents and a memo describing what she termed a “years-long coup” targeting Trump following his 2016 election victory over Clinton. Jarrett argued that the Obama administration’s silence regarding a discredited dossier, compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele, sparked prolonged legal attacks against Trump.
“It all begins with Hillary Clinton. [In the] summer of 2016, the CIA director John Brennan discovers Hillary has approved this plan to falsely smear Trump for colluding with Russia and helped to finance the bogus dossier,” Jarrett told “Fox and Friends” co-host Brian Kilmeade. “We now have Brennan’s handwritten notes recounting two meetings at the White House that included Obama, Biden, Clapper, Comey, and they knew it was all phony, but instead of telling the truth to the American people, they kept silent.”
“They secretly joined in the scheme to vilify Trump. They altered intel documents to propel the scandal, even though U.S. intelligence determined there was no Russian interference in helping Donald Trump win,” Jarrett continued. “So, you know, this was the beginning, Brian, of a decade long lawfare campaign which could actually constitute a vast conspiracy case and I think that’s one of the things the FBI is now looking at, Brennan and Comey are already under investigation, but I suspect it may morph into something much larger.”
The Steele dossier, often referenced by MSNBC and other mainstream media, fueled unverified assertions that Clinton’s 2016 election loss stemmed from Russian interference.
Special Counsel John Durham’s May 15, 2023, report on the FBI’s probe into alleged Trump-Russia collusion concluded that the FBI could not substantiate the dossier’s claims, which were used to secure surveillance warrants against Trump associates like Carter Page. FBI analyst Brian Auten testified in October 2022 that Steele was offered $1 million to verify the dossier’s allegations but failed to do so.
In 2022, the Federal Election Commission fined Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee for their roles in funding the discredited Steele dossier, which promoted the collusion narrative, according to CNN.
Evidence of Democrat Efforts to Undermine Trump’s Election
The allegations that prominent Democrats, including Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden, engaged in efforts to prevent Donald Trump from winning elections through smear campaigns and misuse of federal authority center on events following the 2016 presidential race. These claims, primarily advanced by conservative commentators and officials, point to the Steele dossier and subsequent investigations as tools to discredit Trump’s presidency.
The Steele dossier, compiled by former MI6 officer Christopher Steele, alleged ties between Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russian operatives. Commissioned by Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee through the law firm Perkins Coie, the dossier’s funding was initially obscured, leading to a 2022 Federal Election Commission fine for violating campaign finance disclosure rules. The dossier’s unverified claims became a cornerstone of media narratives and FBI investigations, despite lacking corroboration, as later confirmed by Special Counsel John Durham’s 2023 report.
Durham’s investigation revealed significant flaws in the FBI’s handling of the dossier. The report criticized the bureau’s failure to verify Steele’s allegations before using them to justify surveillance warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) against Trump associate Carter Page. Durham noted that the FBI’s offer of $1 million to Steele for corroboration went unfulfilled, highlighting the dossier’s lack of credible evidence. This misuse of federal resources, critics argue, suggests an attempt to undermine Trump’s legitimacy as president-elect.
Handwritten notes from former CIA Director John Brennan, released in 2020, indicate that he briefed Obama, Biden, and other senior officials in 2016 about intelligence suggesting Clinton’s campaign planned to link Trump to Russia to deflect attention from her email controversy. These notes, cited by Gabbard and Jarrett, imply that the Obama administration was aware of the dossier’s dubious origins but did not publicly challenge its use, raising questions about complicity in a real effort to damage Trump’s campaign.
The FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation, launched in July 2016, relied heavily on the dossier’s claims to probe alleged Trump-Russia ties. Durham’s report found that the investigation suffered from confirmation bias and lacked rigor, with senior FBI officials, including then-Director James Comey, pushing forward despite thin evidence. Critics contend this reflects an abuse of federal power to target Trump, particularly as the investigation continued into his presidency, culminating in the Mueller probe, which found no conclusive evidence of collusion.
Media amplification of the dossier’s allegations further fueled public perception of Trump’s illegitimacy. Outlets like MSNBC and CNN frequently cited the dossier in 2016 and 2017, often without noting its unverified nature. This coverage, combined with leaks from intelligence officials, sustained the Russia narrative, which critics argue was a deliberate strategy to weaken Trump’s mandate and influence subsequent elections.
The 2020 release of declassified documents, including Brennan’s notes and communications between FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, revealed internal skepticism about the dossier’s reliability yet showed continued use in official probes. These revelations have led some, including Gabbard, to characterize the actions as a coordinated “lawfare” campaign spanning multiple election cycles, aimed at preventing Trump from governing effectively.
While no definitive evidence proves Obama, Clinton, or Biden directly orchestrated a conspiracy, the cumulative impact of the dossier’s use, FBI missteps, and selective silence from senior officials has fueled accusations of systemic bias. Ongoing FBI inquiries into Brennan and Comey, as mentioned by Jarrett, suggest that these allegations continue to be examined, though no formal charges have been filed as of July 2025.
