Democrats are always making the most absurd statements. But this may top them all.
And a Republican senator is utterly flabbergasted by what this Leftist just said to him.
In a stunning display of woke evasion during a Senate hearing, a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist flat-out wouldn’t say if a man could get pregnant or not.
This jaw-dropping moment unfolded on Wednesday, exposing the radical Left’s grip on so-called experts who twist facts to fit their agenda.
The showdown happened at the “Protecting Women: Exposing the Dangers of Chemical Abortion Drugs” hearing, where Democrats trotted out Dr. Nisha Verma as their witness. But instead of sticking to hard science, Verma danced around simple truths, leaving Americans shaking their heads.
Missouri Senator Josh Hawley pressed Verma repeatedly: “Can men get pregnant?” His no-nonsense approach aimed to cut through the nonsense and anchor the discussion in reality.
“I’m not really sure what the goal of the question is,” Dr. Verma stated, dodging like a pro.
This wasn’t the first time Verma played this game. Senator Ashley Moody had already grilled her on the same point, highlighting how men are grabbing abortion pills meant for women. Moody’s push exposed the chaos in this debate, but Verma stonewalled her too.
Hawley doubled down, making it crystal clear: “The goal is just to establish a biological reality,” Hawley stated. “Can men get pregnant?”
As an Emory physician backing mifepristone—the controversial abortion drug at the center of the storm—Verma preached about following science on meds but clammed up on basic male-female differences. She pivoted to talk about caring for folks with various “identities.”
“I do take care of people that don’t identify as women,” Verma said.
Verma accused Hawley of oversimplifying lives: “I think you’re trying to reduce the complexity of a lot of people’s lives.”
Verma dismissed the yes-or-no query as a “political tool,” insisting it fueled division rather than dialogue.
“Yes/no questions like this are a political tool.” she said. “I would be more than happy to have a conversation with you that is not coming from a place of trying to be polarized.”
Hawley fired back strong, defending timeless truths: “It is not polarizing to say that women are a biological reality and should be treated and protected as such.”
“That is not polarizing, that is [the] truth.”
The senator looked genuinely shocked at Verma’s grasp on reproduction, calling her out for ignoring fundamentals in a science-focused hearing.
“We are here in a hearing about science, and about women and, for the record, it’s women who get pregnant, not men,” Hawley stated.
“And yet you won’t even acknowledge the basic reality that biological men don’t get pregnant. There is a difference between biological men and biological women. I don’t know how we can take you seriously and your claims to be a person of science if you won’t level with us on this basic issue. I thought we were past all of this.”
Verma kept claiming science creds while whining about “polarized” talk not helping everyday folks.
In the end, Verma’s refusal speaks volumes about the agenda driving Democrats’ witnesses. It’s not about health or facts; it’s about forcing a radical rewrite of nature itself.
