MSNBC has become Donald Trump’s biggest hater. They want nothing more than for the President to fail.
That’s why MSNBC’s hosts were utterly shocked by this U.S. attorney’s Trump confession.
Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Move Gains Traction
President Donald Trump’s audacious executive order, signed on January 20, 2025, to end birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants, has ignited a fierce legal battle that could reshape America’s immigration landscape. The policy, which denies automatic citizenship to children born on U.S. soil to parents unlawfully present, is now under the Supreme Court’s scrutiny. Former U.S. attorney Chuck Rosenberg recently weighed in, suggesting the move might not be as far-fetched as critics claim. “It could change. Might President Trump be proved right? He might be proved right,” Rosenberg said, though he noted it remains “absolutely distinctly the minority view.”
The Supreme Court’s upcoming deliberation could mark a historic shift, potentially overturning the 1898 United States v. Wong Kim Ark decision, which cemented the 14th Amendment’s birthright citizenship clause for all born on U.S. soil. A ruling in Trump’s favor would validate his administration’s argument that the executive branch holds authority to reinterpret this long-standing precedent. Rosenberg highlighted the stakes, noting that such a decision would redefine citizenship rules for millions and signal a bold new direction for immigration policy.
Trump’s order has faced relentless opposition from lower courts, with federal judges issuing blocks to halt its implementation. U.S. District Court Judge John Coughenour, appointed by Reagan, didn’t mince words, labeling the order “blatantly unconstitutional” in a January 23 ruling. This judicial pushback mirrors resistance to other Trump policies, like his moves to end a Biden-era program admitting half-a-million foreign nationals and to mandate proof of citizenship for voting. Yet, the administration remains undeterred, appealing to the Supreme Court on March 13 to lift these blocks, a request the court agreed to consider on April 17.
Democrat-led states have mobilized aggressively against the policy, with over 20 joining the fray alongside immigrant advocacy groups. Washington, Oregon, Arizona, and Illinois launched a multi-state lawsuit the day after the order was signed, aiming to derail Trump’s agenda. New Jersey’s Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin filed a separate suit, citing the 153,000 children born to noncitizen parents in 2022 as evidence of the policy’s sweeping impact. These challenges frame the order as a heartless overreach, but Trump’s supporters see it as a necessary step to secure national borders.
The Supreme Court’s decision will also settle a major question: can district judges unilaterally block executive orders? Trump’s team argues that such judicial interference undermines the president’s authority to act decisively on matters of national importance. The administration’s push to curb birthright citizenship is just a part of the commitment to tightening immigration controls, a cornerstone of Trump’s platform that resonates with millions of Americans frustrated by decades of lax enforcement.
Critics argue the policy disrupts a fundamental American principle, but Trump’s defenders view it as a correction to an outdated system exploited by illegal immigration. The 14th Amendment’s intent, they claim, was never to grant citizenship to those circumventing U.S. law. As the court prepares to weigh this argument, the nation watches closely, aware that a favorable ruling could embolden further reforms to align immigration policy with the administration’s vision.
The legal showdown underscores Trump’s willingness to challenge entrenched norms, even at the risk of controversy. His administration’s persistence in the face of judicial and political opposition signals a determination to deliver on campaign promises. Rosenberg’s cautious optimism—“He might be proved right”—captures the uncertainty, but also the possibility that Trump’s gamble could pay off, reshaping the nation’s approach to citizenship.
As the Supreme Court deliberates, the outcome will ripple far beyond the courtroom. A victory for Trump could galvanize his base and cement his legacy as a transformative leader unafraid to tackle sacred cows. For now, the administration stands firm, ready to defend its vision for a stronger, more sovereign America.
Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Battle Heads to Supreme Court
President Donald Trump’s decisive move to reshape immigration policy through an executive order ending birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants has ignited a high-stakes legal showdown, now poised for argument at the U.S. Supreme Court. The case’s hearings got underway this past Thursday, with no clear decision timeline currently known.
The Supreme Court will grapple with a pivotal question: whether lower court judges possess the authority to issue nationwide injunctions that halt presidential orders across the country. Three federal judges—in Maryland, Massachusetts, and Washington—halted Trump’s birthright citizenship order, prompting the administration to challenge their power to issue such sweeping blocks. The Trump team argues that these injunctions, which have surged in frequency, undermine the presidency’s ability to enact policy. “Universal injunctions have reached epidemic proportions since the start of the current administration,” the government stated in a March court filing, echoing a sentiment that resonates with Trump’s base, who see judicial intervention as a barrier to transformative governance.
Trump’s legal argument hinges on a reinterpretation of the 14th Amendment, which declares that “all persons born or naturalised in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.” In his executive order, Trump contends that the phrase “jurisdiction thereof” excludes children of undocumented immigrants or temporary residents from automatic citizenship.
If successful, a favorable Supreme Court ruling could empower Trump to wield executive orders with fewer judicial constraints, bypassing the often-gridlocked Congress to enact his campaign pledges. From immigration to military policy, as seen in a separate case where the Supreme Court allowed a transgender military ban to proceed despite lower court blocks, Trump’s administration is betting on the conservative-majority court to uphold its authority.
