Republicans aren’t going to let the Left get away with their radical schemes. They’re fighting back for the good of the country.
And Senate Republicans are putting together a plan to stop radical Leftists from stripping freedoms from Americans.
Senate Republicans Push to Block California’s Electric Vehicle Mandate
In a bold move this week, the Republican-led Senate, under the guidance of Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD), is set to challenge a policy from the former Biden administration that granted California significant authority to shape the nation’s automotive future. Speaking from the Senate floor on Tuesday, Thune announced plans to leverage Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolutions to nullify Clean Air Act waivers previously awarded to California by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). These waivers empowered the state to pursue an ambitious plan to phase out new gas-powered vehicle sales by 2035.
Thune sharply criticized the waivers, arguing that they allowed California “to dictate emissions standards for the whole country – effectively imposing a nationwide electric vehicle mandate.” He described the state’s regulations as an overreach of limited Clean Air Act authority, warning that they pose risks to consumers, the economy, and the nation’s energy infrastructure. The push to repeal these waivers signals a growing tension between federal oversight and state-level environmental policies.
The debate hinges on the applicability of the CRA, a mechanism that allows Congress to bypass a filibuster to overturn federal regulations. However, both the Senate parliamentarian and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) have determined that the California waivers do not qualify as rules under the CRA.
Despite this, Thune pointed out that the EPA itself submitted the waivers as rules, and the GOP-controlled House has already passed a CRA resolution to disapprove them, with support from 35 Democrats and no objections from the House parliamentarian.
On the other side, Sen. Alex Padilla (D-CA), a key figure on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, has fiercely opposed the Republican effort. Padilla announced a hold on EPA nominees until the GOP backs down, emphasizing that the waivers are not rules subject to CRA review.
“None of these actions are rules, which is why they’ve never been submitted to Congress as rules,” he stated. Padilla cautioned that if Republicans succeed in overriding the Senate parliamentarian’s ruling, it could set a precedent for endless votes on non-rule matters.
Thune, undeterred, took aim at the GAO, an agency that prides itself on its independence and service to Congress. He accused it of overstepping by declaring that a submitted rule is not a rule, calling it “an extraordinary deviation from precedent.”
Thune warned of potential consequences for the GAO, arguing that its actions undermine Congress’s authority. “It is true that we are facing something of a novel situation,” he said, signaling his intent to bring the issue of the GAO’s involvement to the Senate floor for further scrutiny.
The Democratic Push for Electric Vehicles
Democrats have long championed electric vehicles (EVs) as a cornerstone of their environmental agenda, viewing them as a critical tool to combat climate change. This enthusiasm is evident in policies like California’s plan to ban new gas-powered vehicle sales by 2035, which has been hailed as a progressive step toward a cleaner future. However, this focus often overlooks the practical challenges that EVs present, particularly when compared to the reliability and efficiency of traditional gas-powered cars.
Electric vehicles, while promising in theory, face significant hurdles that question their readiness to replace conventional cars. Battery life remains a persistent issue, with many EVs struggling to maintain consistent performance in extreme weather conditions, such as freezing temperatures or scorching heat.
Charging infrastructure, though improving, is still sparse in many regions, leaving drivers reliant on limited and often inconvenient charging stations. Moreover, the time required to charge an EV—often hours compared to the minutes it takes to refuel a gas-powered car—poses a practical barrier for those with busy schedules or long commutes.
Gas-powered vehicles, by contrast, offer proven dependability and a robust infrastructure that has been refined over decades. Fuel stations are ubiquitous, and refueling is quick and straightforward.
Additionally, gas-powered cars are generally more affordable upfront, with EVs often carrying a higher price tag due to expensive battery technology. While Democrats argue that EVs will save money over time through lower fuel and maintenance costs, the reality is that battery replacements can be prohibitively expensive, and the electrical grid’s capacity to support widespread EV adoption remains a concern.
The fixation on EVs also ignores the economic and social impacts of forcing a rapid transition. Many Americans, particularly in rural areas, rely on gas-powered vehicles for work, travel, and daily life, where EV infrastructure is least developed.
The push to phase out these vehicles risks alienating a significant portion of the population while straining energy resources and supply chains. Critics argue that a more balanced approach—investing in hybrid technologies or improving the efficiency of gas-powered engines—could achieve environmental goals without sacrificing practicality or consumer choice.
Stay tuned to The Federalist Wire.
